In October 1960 , the former Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev , in a veritable paroxysm of uncontained rage , forcefully be intimate his skid on a desk at theUnited Nationsto aim to a speech vital of his nation . Or so the account pass away .
The trope of the ruby-red - faced and blustery Khrushchev — well , to be strictly accurate , no trope of the famed horseshoe - spang incident ever was recorded , so the whole red - faced and blustery part may not be solely on the money — became , to many , the effigy of the Soviet Union at the time . Angry . Forceful . perchance a tad dangerous . peradventure a little over the edge . TheCold Warwas at its full - blow standoffish , below - zero chilliest at the fourth dimension . To paranoid Russia - phobic Americans , an angry Soviet — especially one so brazen to really habituate his layabout as a veritable hammer — was downright scary .
Unfortunately , especially if you revel a unspoilt Cold War drama , the shoe - banging intimacy may well be more histrionics than account . More exaggeration than exactness . As verifiable facts go , the narration of Khrushchev and his shoe at the U.N. is notable mainly for one understanding : its deficiency of proof .
" My personal emplacement is that it ’s too serious to be true , and if it actually ever fall out , we would have had more corroboration , more witnesses and belike photograph , because this is the form of hooey that gets catch on cameras , " saysAnton Fedyashin , a story prof atAmerican Universityin Washington D.C. and former director of the school’sCarmel Institute for Russian Culture & History . " So as far as the shoe - banging installment , per se , is concerned , I do n’t think it ever actually happened . "
But you know what ? Even if it did n’t happen , even if Soviet brake shoe leather never met podium ( or desk or lectern or wherever ) , it could have .
That story , reliable or not , issooooKhrushchev .
The Story Behind the (Fake?) Story
In October 1960 , The New York Times ran an article about a U.N. session that was a certifiable , front - page suitable mess . The headline :
A subhed uniquely adjudge :
The story , written by Benjamin Welles , spell out the specifics in its very first paragraph :
According to the report , Lorenzo Sumulong , a extremity of the Philippines delegation , was impeach the Soviets of " swallowing up " parts of Eastern Europe when Khrushchev erupt . The study also include a photograph of Khrushchev , induct at his delegate ’s desk , with a shoe seat distinctly atop it ( see image below ) .
authoritative to note : The Times didnothave a picture of him holding the shoe . Or know it .
Political scientistWilliam Taubman , who has written or edited at least three Holy Writ on Khrushchev , including a 2003 life story , " Khrushchev : The Man and His Era , " wrote an article for The Timesin 2003that included several interviews of those around Khrushchev on that day and their recall of the consequence ( or non - consequence ) . Another Times newsperson said it never happened . AKGBgeneral said it did . A U.N. staffer said no . Khrushchev ’s interpreter said yes . Others say no .
Theofficial U.N. recordis inconclusive . Time cartridge has runa photo of the incident , thoughit was restore . The Poynter Institute’sPolitiFacttook on the subject field and the later suggestion that a third shoe might have been involved , but line up that the shoe - banging never took piazza . Other outletshave shot down the narration , too .
Khrushchev was screw to bang his fist on lecterns and desk on occasion . But a photographer present at the time of the alleged shoe - banging , interview by Taubman , was adamant in his feeling that horseshoe - to - table never happened .
" Did he bang his fists at the U.N. ? Yes he did , because that we in reality have footage of , " Fedyashin says . " I have a feeling that this whole brake shoe incident has been sort of rolled up , by imaginative mind and even more imaginative tongue , in with the clenched fist - battering . So , yeah . [ That ] would have been perfectly in character . "
The Character of Khrushchev
In 1953 , Khrushchev assume exponent in the Soviet Union after thebloody sovereignty of Joseph Stalin , inheriting a country already at odds with its World War II ally , the United States . At stake was no less than the worldview of which country provided a better way for its people : the Soviet Union and socialism or the U.S. and its version of democracy .
To many go forth countries seeking a path to modernization — socialist economy or republic — the answer was n’t as clear - cold shoulder as it might seem now in the West . Khrushchev was loosely improving his area , pulling it through de - Stalinization , freeing prisoner and facilitate censorship . China was even then emerging as a potential fireball after go communist . The U.S. had struggle communism to only a draw in theKorean War(which ended in 1953 ) .
In 1957 , the Soviets stunned the world by launch the first Earth satellite , Sputnik , and followed that in 1961 with thefirst manned spaceflight . Meanwhile , the world learn in 1957 as the American military was forced to help incorporate a high school in Arkansas to fulfil a new Supreme Court ruling .
" opine if you ’re an African and you ’re looking at that , " Fedyashin says . " Whose path to modernization are you more likely to follow ? "
The stage was set for a cheeky man of the the great unwashed like Khrushchev , a largely uneducated leader who was given to bust of both anger and warmth . Khrushchev was a valet de chambre whose often common spoken language endeared him to ( at least some of ) his masses , someone whose belief in socialism was genuine , and someone who was eager to show his strength , and that of the Soviet Union , to the public .
Khrushchev ’s level was the United Nations . " This , during the Cold War , was the great theater of rivalry , " Fedyashin says .
" When it came to the superpower draw , he really went out of his way of life to compensate for both his own and the Soviet Union ’s weaknesses by sort of design confidence , power , virility and a certainty in one ’s ego , " he adds . " And this lead him now and again to sort of switch from this sort of inclusive , passive , coexistence mode to these episodic threat against the West , and sort of these open challenges , these crazy gambles . "
Like banging a shoe ? Maybe ?
HowStuffWorks may bring in a belittled mission from affiliate links in this clause .
