It ’s the kind of arrangement you draw up when you ’re a tad interested that your land might be obliterated bynuclear warheads . It ’s also the sort of text file you might scrawl on a bar diaper , delineate a far - fetched business sector design after an evening of a few too many White Russians . It ’s amemorandum of discernment , a effectual condition that have got major implications for both external and domestic law ( and perchance even a few cocktail - sully napkins , too ) .

A memorandum of understanding ( MOU ) is , concisely , a written agreement . An MOU is sometimes confused with other , similar patois , such asletter of intentormemorandum of understanding . For most effectual purposes , however , all three of these terms amount to basically the same affair .

MOUs are very common and are used for domesticated purposes and agreements between nations . Some are general and concise . Others are long - winded and extremely elaborate .

No matter their length or complexity , MOUs set reciprocally - accept expectations between two or more people or organisation as they labour together toward a vernacular objective . And here are two other touchstones of MOUs – generally they ’re not de jure binding , in part because neither party wants to deal with the ramification of a binding accord , and they do n’t involve the exchange ofmoney .

You might think that memo of understanding sound suspiciously similar to contract bridge , but there are really pregnant difference between the two . Acontractis a write , individual agreement between two company that is legally bind and can be enforced by a jurist .

Contracts spell out the nitty - farinaceous certificate of indebtedness of each company which , if offend , can spell dire consequences for the entity that break it . declaration are necessary when there is any sort of exchange of money because they help to protect the interest of both party and ensure trust .

MOUs are less formal than contracts , and typically let in fewer detail and complexities , but they are more formal than handshake agreements , sometimes calledgentlemen ’s agreements . All sorts of entities use MOUs to create guidelines for each party as they bring their exploit and resources toward authoritative projects . But ultimately , the reason that parties opt for MOUs is because they are dim-witted and more flexible than contract .

Well - write MOUs muse diplomatic savvy and originative analytic thinking . They also provide a mutually good model that both entity can ferment within to achieve shared goal . On the next page , you ’ll see why memo of discernment are virtual famous person in the legal world .

Why, Oh Why, Use MOUs?

Memoranda of understanding are often implement in private police and international law , and often between both political science and non - government office and company . Basically , an MOU is an aspect of the spirit of talk terms party .

MOUs are basically an arrangement that two parties create before a negotiate document is finalized . That ’s good – it ’s an understanding before an concord . It ’s a aggregation of vital point of accordance between two or more entities that intend to establish a working kinship of some kind .

You may wonder why two party would go to the effort of putting together an MOU , especially considering that it ’s not an enforceable papers . In some fount , a company is de jure command to create MOUs , such as when caparison dominance negociate with tenants .

But MOUs hold a deal of possible power because of thetimeand free energy they take to plan and write . They require the parties to come to some kind of reciprocal agreement , and so as to do that , they have to take caudex of their needs and wants and put them to composition .

In these kinds of situations , an MOU is an appealing option because it ’s simple and direct , without the sort of complex and combative stock term and conditions of contract bridge law . In other dustup , MOUs do n’t require either side to " lawyerup " and develop for hard - inwardness , hairsplitting declaration talk .

Although each side must put some thought into the MOU , the process for create one is jolly straightforward . Generally , each party starts in a preparation stage to specify what they want or need the other party to provide , what they have to proffer , what they are willing to negotiate , and the rationale for an MOU . Perhaps most important , the MOU spells out the parties ' common objectives .

After the initial draft is compose , representatives for the party meet in person to negotiate and chaffer over the MOU ’s finer points . Many MOUs spell out communication details , such as verbal description of both parties ' capabilities and how they related to each other ’s ' interest . The MOU may also document contact information for each party ’s representatives , set dates for performance reviews and create processes for difference of opinion resolution .

Other specific terms of the agreement are usually include , too , such as when the agreement begins , how long it lasts and how one or both entity can give the axe the MOU . An MOU can also have disclaimer and restrictions , as well as privateness statements . Once they number to an agreement on those details , both parties ratify the MOU .

All of these might sound like elements that would come out in a contract bridge , but think of that MOUs are not legally binding . Well , not ordinarily , anyway . This being law , there are always exceptions , and as you ’ll find out on the next page , if one or both parties are n’t paying close aid , contract - flavored memorandum of understanding can leave behind a very unfit gustatory perception .

The Ties That Bind

You ’ve already seen the kind of information that ’s usually included in MOUs . This information often resemble the terms of a legally bind contract , but MOUs typically are not enforceable . However , there are exceptions and specification that can spell out serious legal consequences for parties who break memoranda of sympathy .

For example , if the capacity of the MOU is exactly like a declaration in spoken communication and intent , then a court is likely to call it a contract bridge , no matter what title might appear on the front page . This issue arises often , as parties attempt to pull wires the words of an MOU to resemble a contract without the risks of actual contractual indebtedness .

In another instance , although MOUs are n’t stick , they may admit provisions that are , such as privacy or nondisclosure agreements . If either party violates such provisions , they may be hold liable .

There are standard for limit whether an MOU might be binding . A judge reviewing one would look for four central elements that usually define a declaration : anoffer , acceptanceof the whirl , anintentionto be lawfully bind , andconsideration(the welfare that each political party bargains for as part of a contract ) .

A justice weigh such factors when determining whether the MOU is in reality an enforceable document . If the MOU ’s damage are clear and coherent , and reinforce by thoughtfulness , then a judge would likely find the MOU to be a bond understanding , no matter what it ’s called . In brusque , if the parties specify for the entire document to be bind , they should probably choose for a declaration rather .

It might vocalize kind of comical , or perhaps just redundant , but in many state of affairs , party are very measured to verify their MOU can in no direction be read as a declaration . They do so by including disclaimers and phrases such as " This memo is not intend to and does not create any contractual rights between these parties . "

irrespective of how cautious the authors might be , MOUs pose endangerment . In a byplay surround , these cozy agreements lack the formality and standardizations of a contract that would protect both parties during the project . As a outcome , legal curative might be nonexistent in the effect of non - functioning or a lack of adhesion to the MOU .

Those are some of the reason that a sight oflawyersdon’t really like MOUs . Without standards , memoranda of understanding are often ambiguous , lawfully fuzzy documents that can lead to mental confusion and disputative appearances in court [ source : McCormick ] . Still , in cattiness of a deficiency of love from attorney , MOUs come in ready to hand in a lot of position , such as skirt bureaucratism and skilfully limboing under monumental amounts of red taping .

What Red Tape?

Bureaucrats like MOUs because the ease of these documents allows them to dodge the kind of examination and red tape recording that so often infestation contracts and accord . MOUs skirt processes that would slow up down implementation and cooperation , thereby helping parties get thing done much more apace than they would through more formal channel .

For deterrent example , when multiple government agencies postulate to define their obligation and pool their resources for a project , they often indite MOUs instead of declaration , peculiarly when contract between governance divisions are restricted by law . Although some interagency kinship can be form and maintained by informal reason between executive and proletarian , others are more complicated and require a report trail . That ’s where MOUs come in .

MOUs are a sign on commitment from the agency to exploit together in a specified way . For representative , when the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs and the Indian Health Service wanted to better the health fear of American Indian Veterans , they sign on off on a plan to improve imagination communion and coordination between the two agencies .

Another interagency MOU , between the U.S. Department of Agriculture , the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health , was created in 2011 to protect the welfare of laboratory animate being . This MOU outlined right care and use of the animals , and attempted to forestall duplicate of travail between the organizations .

Memoranda of realise work well between the governments of countries , too , sometimes to hasten an correspondence ontime - sensitive consequence . These text file are used for purposes both spectacular and mundane .

In 1973 , the U.S. and Cuba signalize an MOU that made the highjacking ofairplanesand other vessel a condemnable offense . In 1996 , Iraq sign an MOU that indicated it harmonize with terms of an oil - for - solid food programme , which let the commonwealth to sell its oil colour to buy intellectual nourishment for its citizens , who were suffer under embargo conditions enforced by theUnited Nations . In 2004 , Brazil and Canada signed an MOU that permit each country share best practice session with esteem to labour inspections , occupational safe , compensation systems and more .

But even in external situations , MOUs are n’t oblige . They are considered a form ofsoft law , which means they are weaker ( less enforceable ) than traditional " hard " laws but still provide evidence of both parties ' intent to conform to through on an accord . Soft laws like MOUs leave an appealing style for countries to join forces in place of treaty , which are binding and can leave in serious international repercussions when go .

In the U.S. , the Securities Exchange Commission has more and more relied on MOUs to investigate people and companies who act abroad in attempts to flout U.S. fiscal laws . MOUs help regulator annul prison term - consuming accord procedures and provide a degenerate , more pliable mean of international security regularisation .

Now you know why memoranda of understanding are so widespread . Next , you ’ll get the downcast - down on some of the best - know ( and perhaps even detest ) MOUs around .

Famous and Controversial MOUs

So , say you ’re a United States presidential candidate preparing for an upcomingdebate , but you really do n’t want to answer or require any substantial questions . No trouble . Just have your attorney force up an MOU that outlines a framework for a staged public debate .

One of the most famous example of this happened in 2004 , as George W. Bush and John Kerry fight for office . Both party concur to a 32 - page MOU , which controlled many aspects of the disputation and allow them well manage their public personas .

But not all politico use MOUs to dodge off - the - handcuff argumentation questions ; some employ them to forestall warfare . In 1972 , President Richard Nixon and the Soviet Union agreed on an MOU that create a direct telecommunication link between the two side , with the intent that this arrangement could keep mistaking that might take tonuclear war .

In 1997 , the Clinton government activity composed an MOU to update the 1972 Anti - Ballistic Missile Systems Treaty to reflect changes that pass as the former USSR resolve into several successor states . This MOU occur at a critical articulation , when the world was upset about the security of the former USSR ’s nuclear reserve .

In spite of their popularity , MOUs do now and again draw criticism . In 2008 , the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ( ICE ) launched a programme called Secure Communities , which is design to help oneself state and local law enforcement personnel key out criminal illegal alien and deport them .

ICE sign MOUs ( often call memoranda of concord in these instances ) with local law enforcement agencies around the land to gain their cooperation . But the agreement came under fire from critics , who called the plan a design to ferret out out and deport all illegalimmigrants , including those hold noncriminals .

MOUs play a bad role in societal issues around the world . The United Kingdom signed an MOU in 2005 to humanely expatriate unwelcome Nigerians who overstayed their visas or run out to gain asylum . The agreement include terms for safe escort by Nigerian authorities . In other cases , MOUs avail citizenry in a quandary . In 2011 , Kenya signed an MOU with the United Nations to address the condition of refugee camp within its borders . The text file specified security quantity and means for fork up goodness and services to the impoverished the great unwashed in the camp .

All of these examples demonstrate how significant MOUs have become for business , governance and political purposes . And , no matter whether you deem their purposes nefarious or inspiring , MOUs are an established form of written communication that provide a powerful substance for pushing through on important business projects , vex deadlines and put through governmental polices all over the world .

Memorandum of Understanding FAQ

Lots More Information

Sources