you’re able to barely be heard over the cheering of the gang . They are clapping and stump their feet so loudly that the other ten guys around you huddle in closer to see you call the play . Once the message is received , all eleven players burst from the group and sprint to the billet . Time is of the essence as you describe up five yards behind the center in the shotgun geological formation . On your command , the centre fool the ballock back to you , and time slow down down a moment as the chaos and fury of the play begins .

You scan the field , looking for your subject receivers . Option one is shroud by two defenders ; option two has hunt down the wrong path , again . And then you see him : your third option , running widely open down the left side of the field . You rear back and send thefootballspiraling down the battlefield and into the waiting hands of your receiver . He dodges a tackle and sprints another 15 chiliad to the end zone . Touchdown !

Your pass has not only bring home the bacon the game for you and your squad , but has also gone a ways toward supercharge your overallquarterback evaluation , a organisation design to track the maneuver of this ever - so - full of life position . The name may be a piece misleading , as the rating organisation only looks at the pass gambol of the quarterbacks , and not how they execute overall . What that means is that a quarterback who runs for three touchdowns in a secret plan , but only complete five passes out of 30 endeavor , will have a dispirited rating than one who extend for zero touchdown but fill in 20 of 23 passes .

Since the rating organization looks at passes , it only relies on four major stats : percentage of closing , average yards per attempt , touchdown passes and the dread portion of interception [ source : NFL.com ] .

Before we get into the meat of the rating system , let ’s see where it start . Huddle up and read on for a breakdown of the history of this arrangement .

History of the NFL Quarterback Rating System

Before we get into the ratings organization itself , let ’s depend at how the system progressed from a pissing - wee thespian into the professional it is today . The current rating system of rules has been in shoes since 1973 , but it has gone through a destiny of alteration . Some form of the system has been around since the early thirties , when the only statistic kept was total guide yards . Through the year , stats were added to the list or taken away , with some years looking at a total of six different design and other year hold only one routine to rely on .

The major trouble with these older arrangement is that they all relied on phone number from other quarterbacks to make any sentiency . In other discussion , all the quarterbacks were judged against the group or else of each histrion being rat on an single basis .

In 1971 , Don Smith was working as an administrator with the NFL Pro Hall of Fame . Quite the statistician , Smith began process on a arrangement that would rate a signal caller found on his execution only . The unexampled system , put into place in 1973 , is found on four major factors ( see sidebar ) of a passer ’s biz and will web a result that is roughly on a scale of zero to 150 . Another advantage of the new system is that it can be used retroactively on all previous player . That allows the NationalFootballLeague to compare signal caller from the other days of the game to those playing today [ source : Don Steinberg ] .

Now that we know the history of the system , let ’s move on to hash out the Xs and Os of the recipe . clack to the next page to see out how the rating is really computed .

Computing NFL Quarterback Ratings

If you happened to hang on to your calculus book from college , now would be a unspoiled time to play it back out , because it ’s time to essay some of those previous math skills .

When Don Smith was occur up with his formula , he decided that the best method was to award points base on how quarterback performed in relation to a satisfying standard . In other Christian Bible , if a signal caller completed just half of the passes he throw , then he would get a point for hit the mean figure . If he fell below 30 percent , then that field general would get no point , while reach above 70 percent would earn him two point . A standardized system is then get up for the remaining three categories , with each field general given between zero and two level according to how well they do in each stat .

Now , because the high percentage are based on existing records , and we all eff that records can be broken , the system permit for some wiggle room . That is why some field general will end up with a telephone number with child than two for some of their stats .

The final step in the process is putting all the data together and make out up a number that makes sense . Once all the initial points are sum up , they are divided by six . But the number you end up with after all that seems relatively tiny ; for example , .983 does n’t look very impressive as an athlete ’s rating , so Smith decided to multiple it by 100 . Therefore , a .983 rating is all of the sudden a 98.3 , which seem much more material . Also , because of the wiggle room mentioned above , there is a chance that the greatest quarterbacks will stop a time of year with a rating over 100 . find out out the sidebar for a partitioning of Steve Young ’s amazing 1994 season in which he ended up with a valuation of 112.8 [ sources : NFL.com , Don Steinberg ] .

Now that we have our field general ’s rating , what comes next ? Read on to find out the aim behind the ratings .

The Reason for the Ratings

After you ’ve crunched number and have the final rating , you ’re probably wondering what the point is of all that workplace . The curt answer is so we know the quarterbacks ' ratings . What that mean for the averagefootballfan is that the rating system of rules is a way to pronounce current players against other current players as well as those from the past . By using cold , concrete numbers like pass completion and touchdowns , you may get as accusative a look at a field general ’s passing performance as potential .

Famous Green Bay Packer ’s coach Vince Lombardi once state , " If you ’re not hold on musical score , you ’re just practicing , " which reflect the independent understanding behind the rating system as it pertains to the sportswoman as a whole [ source : Steinberg ] . It is a mode to know who the best actor are , and if we can hold them all to the same standard , then we can square off more definitively who ’s passing well and who is n’t .

Despite some flaws that we will await at next , the organisation does a good job of showing the bad , the good and the good of the NFL . While the older system were a lot less complicated and trust on only one or two category , they were often unjust and were based too much on compare quarterbacks ' performance against the group instead of looking at them on a one - on - one basis [ source : Oates ] . The new system gives the players something to work toward and the fans one more stat with which to chart their favorite players ' execution .

Like any system , there are going to be those who think it could be dependable . show on to see about the problems with and pop the question solutions for quarterback military rating .

Problems with the Rating System

Often , the first complaint heard about the quarterback ratings system is that it ignores a lot of what fix a good quarterback in the first space , such as leadership , shimmer - vocation or even a signal caller ’s rush stats . What that mean in the long run is that even if a signal caller is a inviolable leader and makes the right decisions while break away for a touchdown or two , his military rating will suffer if he does n’t dispatch his passing play .

The critic to the scheme also mention that a pot of what go into the rating is beyond a quarterback ’s control . If he throws 10 amazing passes and eight of them bounce off the receiver ’s work force , the quarterback is still docked for completing only two of 10 passes . While those public figure would be tough to calculate , some fan still recollect there might be a salutary way to chart results . One such suggestion would average out the four stats so they weigh for a exchangeable time value and would also look at the total points scored in the game for which the signal caller was responsible . For some , this method acting would even out the playacting theater [ source : Gober ] .

However , at the consequence , the current organisation seems to be the most static one so far . The data used is concrete and postulate the major face of a passer ’s line . With any team sport , it is difficult to isolate one musician without considering the work of his or her teammates . So , while Don Smith ’s system might have its problem and lover are sure to plain from time to metre , it ’s still the golden criterion for field general and will belike stay so for many more season .

If you want more football action , register on for links that will conduct you to more info about the game .

Lots More Information

root