For more than 80 years , the American Civil Liberties Union ( ACLU ) has work to defend fundamental rightfield such as freedom of voice communication , exemption of religious belief and the right wing to privacy . The efforts of ACLU attorney have also influenced interpretations of U.S. Constitutional practice of law . The ACLU has grown to let in more than 400,000 members and handles around 6,000 court cases each twelvemonth [ ref ] .
However , the ACLU and controversy are never far apart . It has most often total under attack from conservativist and the government activity , but its defense of religious figures and neo - Nazis has drawn the ire of liberals as well . In this clause , we ’ll find out what the ACLU does and where it came from . We ’ll also learn why it ’s so controversial .
The ACLU is a non - profit organization that provides sound care to people whose cases come down under its mission . consort to the ACLU’sWeb site :
The defense of shore leave seems innocent . So why is the ACLU so controversial ? Simply put , the organization holds anabsolutistview of impropriety – they defend all people whose liberties have been violated , even if their views , idea or actions are unpopular . Therefore , the ACLU cease up defending Nazis , pornographers , spiritual Zealot and extremists of all types .
The point of such unpopular grammatical case is to protect the right of all minorities . Many minorities do have unpopular points of perspective . In the ACLU ’s eyes , the right of a Nazi radical to freedom meeting place is just as authoritative as , for example , Native Americans ' freedom of assembly . earmark the government activity to curtail any group ’s freedoms would invite restriction on other groups .
Of of course , this philosophy draws a good deal of opposition , on both the left and the right hand . The United States already draws a crinkle between address protected by the First Amendment and unprotected speech : child pornography , for exercise , is unprotected . Some sense that hatred words should be likewise curtail , while others debate that anti - war or anti - government words during a clock time of war or national crisis should be restrict ( as it has been at many prison term throughout U.S. story ) .
ACLU History
After resist to comply with a draft notification , Baldwin wait on a class in jail . Upon his release , Baldwin headed up a restructure NCLB , now the American Civil Liberties Union . The ACLU ’s prescribed " birthday " is January 19 , 1920 [ ref ] .
Initially , the ACLU did not seelitigationas the primary means of affect alteration . Baldwin intended to use publicity , protests and publications . The rationality for this was simple – the courts of the time , including the Supreme Court , were openly unfriendly toward civil liberties . The NCLB had lost well-nigh all the homage cases they had fought during the state of war yr .
The ACLU was soon influence on a wide-eyed range of issues , include supporting lying-in unions , opposing military propaganda in schools and work with the NAACP to ensure the right of smuggled Americans in an epoch before Civil Rights had become a major American issue .
In the next section , we ’ll essay the influence the ACLU has had on integral law .
The ACLU and the Constitution
A very small number of motor inn cases actually cease up before the Supreme Court . Many of the ACLU ’s victory came in low motor hotel , but these subject still go to a gradual increase in the legal standing of civil liberties . Those case that did derive before the Supreme Court are among the most famous , and crucial , in U.S. chronicle .
The Supreme Court decided a major case , West Virginia State Board Of Education v. Barnette , in 1943 . In this case , a school board expel 2,000 students who were Jehovah ’s Witnesses for refusing to enumerate thePledge of Allegiance . Their spiritual beliefs forbade them from worshipping image , including the flag . With the ACLU at their defense , the Jehovah ’s Witnesses won the case . The Supreme Court declare that no functionary could force anyone to adjudge his or her belief in any religion or nation [ ref ] .
In the 1944 case ofSmith v. Allwright , the ACLU argued that a Democratic Party ’s " blanched primary feather " was illegal because it denied blackness a chance to participate in the democratic process . antecedently , courts had declare political parties to be secret organizations that were not open to anti - discrimination law . However , the Supreme Court declared that participation in a political primary feather was too crucial to the track of a commonwealth and the civic participation of citizen to permit certain classes to be eject [ ref ] . This opinion also tone up the federal government ’s power over state government activity .
A 1952 case , Joseph Burstyn , Inc. v. Wilson , had lasting repercussions in the American film manufacture and was a landmark typeface in overturning government censoring . New York ’s State Board of Regents blocked theaters from showing the celluloid " The Miracle " because Catholic officials called it sacrilegious . urban center officials threatened theaters with revocation of their licenses if they showed it . In some typesetter’s case , they just banned the cinema in a flash . Justice Tom Clark state , " The state has no legitimate interest in protect any or all religions from views distasteful to them . It is not the business of our governance to suppress real or reckon attacks upon a exceptional religious philosophical system , whether they appear in issue , talking to , or motion pictures . " [ ref ] .
Engel vs. Vitale , 1962 , was one of several cases to make that prayer and Bible readings could n’t be conducted in public schools by school functionary , even if they were voluntary [ ref ] .
late ACLU efforts overturned the Communications Decency Act of 1996 because factor of the number limited indecent language , which is protect by the First Amendment . The ACLU has also extend the competitiveness against the USA Patriot Act and other civil liberty restriction enacted in the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist approach . Another primary focal point has beensurveillanceof American citizen by the National Security Agency ( NSA ) , which the ACLU deliberate illegal .
Next , we ’ll teach about some of the ACLU ’s most controversial cases .
ACLU’s Most Controversial Cases
Many of the ACLU ’s cases were controversial at the time , but some of them exposed great divides in the views of the American populace , and even schism within the ACLU itself . This was never more reliable than in the 1930s and 40s , when the ACLU simultaneously defended the right of blackness on behalf of the NAACP and the right of the Klu Klux Klan to hold rally and give speeches calling for the abolition of those rights . The ACLU ’s determination to fight down anyone ’s rights , even the rights of people whose ideas they may abhor , was famously satirized by The Onion in this article , titled " ACLU Defends Nazis ' rightfield to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters . "
This issue also became unmistakable when the ACLU found itself fight down Henry Ford for make anti - union statements in 1937 . The National Labor Relations Board ( NLRB ) declared that anti - union remarks directed towards employees could be restricted because the employees could comprehend them as direct threats against joining a pairing . The ACLU , commonly a staunch jockstrap of the DoL movement , felt that Ford ’s right to free speech must be maintain , although some phallus of the formation disagree .
One of the ACLU ’s most infamous case was theSkokie Free - address Controversy . In 1977 , the National Socialist Party of America , a small group of neo - Nazis based in Chicago , requested permit from the suburb of Skokie , IL to restrain a demonstration . Since World War II , Skokie had become a center of Chicago ’s Jewish residential district and included a declamatory number of Holocaust survivors . functionary initially responded by point out a natural law that required a $ 350,000 insurance policy bond before they could grant permission to demonstrate . Neo - Nazi drawing card Frank Collin turned the refusal into a gratis spoken communication takings , claiming that the community was repressing the mathematical group ’s right hand to meet and utter their views . He asked the ACLU for assistance .
The ACLU match with Collin . After a series of appeals , the Illinois Appellate Court declare that the demonstration , speech communication and even the video display of the swastika were variety of political speech protected by the First Amendment . The tourist court overturned the insurance legislative act because the prohibitive cost of such an insurance policy ( about $ 1,000 ) stand for that anyone without the funds would be ineffectual to demonstrate .
In the ending , Nazis never march in Skokie , even though they receive a permit to do so . Eventually , a few 12 Nazis show in business district Chicago , escorted by law and border by thousand of tempestuous protestors .
The casing was a watershed statement that the government can not control voice communication based on the content of the speech itself , no matter how obnoxious . Despite many argumentation against it , the ACLU had stayed true to its principle of oppose the civil autonomy of even the most abhorrent and hated groups . The ACLU ’s point is that it is not up to the governance to drag the cable between what we are allow to see and get word and what is forbidden ; each soul gets to make that decision on his or her own . Taking a stand on this return be the ACLU dearly in terms of financial and unpaid worker support , but the resulting organisational milk shake - up may have led to undecomposed long - full term health for the organization .
Next we ’ll look at how the ACLU is organized .
ACLU Organization
Today , the ACLU comprises two different organizations . Collectively these radical go under the name ACLU , but each branch take in charge different tasks in defense of civic liberty . TheAmerican Civil Liberties Unionfocuses primarily on political lobbying . When someone " bring together " the ACLU and go a rank carte du jour , they are join this leg of the organization . Laws restrict lobbying group from accepting tax - deductible donations , so membership dues are not taxation deductible . TheACLU Foundationworks through litigation and communication efforts . Donations made to the ACLU Foundationaretax deductible .
The ACLU national headquarters is in New York City , NY , but each state has its own chapter . Each chapter operates autonomously , although some small chapters receive funding from the internal chapter . On certain major subject , the home chapter fuck off forthwith require . The national organization formulates ACLU policy and positions , but the chapter are not require to stick by to them . In many case , the interior organization and its chapters have take issue over the proper form of action .
Each chapter is for the most part responsible for for its own funding . While funding source and measure vary from chapter to chapter , roughly half come in from contribution . Remaining backing consists of grant from other organizations , ACLU investment , and attorney fees , which are awarded when the ACLU gain a lawsuit . This last funding seed has make some controversy .
Next , we ’ll talk over ACLU lawyer ' fees and other reason citizenry are opposed to the ACLU .
ACLU Opposition
People oppose the ACLU for many different reason . Often , it comes down to a single issue or readiness of issues . For deterrent example , many religious groups oppose the ACLU because it actively works to maintain the interval of church and state . These efforts gain excess attention every December when they mouth out against spiritual displays and birth scene on regime property . In recent years , this has turned into a backlash against a perceive " warfare on Christmas . "
One of the most pervasive opponents of the ACLU is Catholic League President William A. Donohue . He has written several books on the ACLU , and has praise it at times for fighting for the civic liberties of Catholics . Conversely , Donohue has stated that the ACLU ’s defence of exemption of voice communication has led to polite disorder as well as expensive and unnecessary societal service programs [ ref ] . literary criticism of the ACLU also stems from the feeling that some civil liberties should be restricted in favor of security , especially in times of war or crisis . Considering the rootage of the ACLU , it is unlikely that it would ever agree with such a locating .
The ACLU ’s assemblage of attorneys ' fees also pertain some critics . If the ACLU wins a case argued by one if its attorneys , it can sue for recovery of attorneys ' fee . administration functionary , federal agency and institutions are often immune to this sort of retrieval , but not always ( it depends on the applicable laws and the nature of the civic right violation ) . These fees can be very costly , often reaching six figure . Some exact that the ACLU uses these fee as a form of intimidation , forcing municipality to do what it enounce for fear of paying tremendous fees [ ref ] . Some see this as a case of government money ( " tax - remunerator dollars " ) indirectly fund the ACLU . However , other effectual aid governing body sue to pile up attorneys ' fees as well .
disregarding of its critic , the ACLU is n’t likely to go anywhere – it ’s been one of the most active ( and controversial ) legal aid governing body of the past 80 old age . Whether they agree or disaccord with its policies , the ACLU ’s legal action have encouraged many Americans to closely consider the right hand award them by the Constitution .
go over out the links on the next Sir Frederick Handley Page for more information about the ACLU and related topics .
Lots More Information
Related HowStuffWorks Articles
More Great Links
source
