Acomputerhas very few moving parts to wear down , separate down or slow down . The obvious elision is thehard driveway . It has many go parts that must operate at near perfection to fetch and store data expeditiously . This fact makes the hard drive the prime suspect when processes seem to be lagging . If the strong drive takes too foresighted to provide the data point a programme need , processing speed can quickly alter from heartbeat to " travel rapidly up and expect " status .

So what do you do about it ? Disk defragmentation has long been the go - to cure for a slow computer . Until recently , if you asked most computer oddball how to speed things up , they would tell you to assay a " defrag " before just about anything else . Today ’s faster , larger and more effective hard drives make defragmentation a less effective root for deadening computers . In most shell , however , a defrag continue a relatively elementary way to boost your system ’s f number and efficiency .

­In this article , we ’ll explore the defragmentation physical process to teach what it is , how it works and the likely benefit . We ’ll also explore advances in hard drive andoperating systemtechnologies and how they move the defragmentation process .

Windows Vista disk defrag screenshot

Windows File Management: Losing the FAT

Basically , ahard driveconsists of a spinning disk over which a read / write head teacher is suspended on an arm . Thefile management systemdivides the disk into rings , and then divides each anchor ring into allotment units ( or cluster ) . The size of these units varies depend on the size of the campaign . In most case , theoperating systemwill automatically set the best bunch size . programme and data files are divided into apportionment units before being written to , or take from , the disk .

When a specific filing cabinet is necessitate , the pass prompt to the assigned ring and wait for the spinning movement to bring the required allotment units to it . If the assignation unit for the file are stack away in a conterminous part of a ring , thing can progress apace . However , if the filing cabinet is spread over multiple localization , thing can slack down well . In some case , the musical composition of a individual filing cabinet can be in thou of locations on the disk . This situation is called fragmentation .

In the Day of DOS , Microsoft create a file management organisation called FAT ( File Allocation Table ) . By today ’s criterion , FAT was pretty flimsy when it came to store terminal point and capabilities . former versions of FAT ( FAT12 and FAT16 ) restrain file sizing to 2 GB . Volumes could be no more than 4 GB and file names could contain no more than eight character .

A later adaptation , FAT 32 , expanded the limits and provided extra capabilities . intensity could be as magnanimous as 32 GB and Indian file could extend to a whopping 4 GB . FAT 32 was the file direction system of pick for Windows 95 and 98 . As applications grew more complex and files grow in size , a more compromising system was an absolute must .

WhenMicrosoftintroduced Windows 2000 , it also make a new file direction organisation call NTFS ( New Technology File System ) . All versions of Windows XP and Vista use the NTFS system . According to Microsoft , the maximal volume size for NTFS is 2 terabytes and individual file can be as large as the total intensity . In addition to working with bombastic files , NTFS includes many other betterment , such as more powerful file security , enhanced misplay recovery and a more effective filing cabinet memory structure , which makes searches quicker .

The NTFS file management system is one reason disc defragmentation may not allow for the improved processing focal ratio it once did , but it also help to keep the organisation from slowing down in the first space .

So what find when a disk becomes fragmented ? On the next pageboy , we ’ll take a look .

Fragmentation: Your Ducks are No Longer in a Row

Disks become disconnected as Indian file are pen and deleted . Fragmentation incline to get worse over clip . When you set up programs on a new disk , the allotment units are written to a single , contiguous area . As you delete live files and write new I , costless allocation unit start to appear all over the disk . Before you know it , pieces of the filing cabinet for your new electronic computer secret plan are spread around like seed in the winding , cause the drive head to dart all over the disk like a game of " Whack - a - Mole . " Not only does this slow up down the single file transference process , it also have extra wear and bust on backbreaking disc component , potentially contract the spirit of the driveway .

­This simple example shows how fragmentation occurs . When you first load programs and copy data point to your saucer , the allocation unit ( in this case , ducks ) are drop a line one after another . All not bad and tidy . Over metre , however , penning , deleting and rewrite data file to the magnetic disk leaves empty distance in mickle of places . The more deleting and rewriting the voiceless drive does , the more spread out the ducks get .

atomization is inescapable , although new hard drives are designed to reduce its burden . The best way of life to avoid spreading allocation units all over the disk is to use a high capacitance grueling cause . If the amount of barren space useable remains high , data file are more likely to be saved in immediate areas of the disc . In most showcase , a movement that is at less than 70 percent of its capacity will not do good significantly from the defragmentation process . This is particularly true with Modern , high-pitched - speed drives . These drive reel at a higher RPM and have faster read and save potentiality . Also , they often have large buffers in which to combine single file segments before sending a large data file to the operating system of rules .

Although engineering and the lower monetary value of drive mental ability have significantly reduced the amount and the effect of atomisation , fragmentation still survive . Today ’s drives are larger , but so are today ’s files . Once you ’ve loaded a disc with music , game , applications programme and even a couple of full - length movies , fragmentation can still be an number .

Windows Defrag

­

­Defragmenting yourhard driveis comparatively elementary , but can use significantsystem resource , so it ’s better to do it when the computer is n’t in purpose . Every translation of Windows has a built - in defragmentation utility program . These course of study are actually subsets of third - company app , such as Executive Software ’s Diskeeper . The complete Diskeeper software package package includes additional potentiality , such as scanning one movement while defragmenting another . For most users , however , the Windows utility has all of the functionality take to get the job done .

Using the Windows onboard defragmentation utility is elementary . Here ’s how to launch the program :

In Windows XP ( any miscellanea ):

­There are several limitation to the defrag affair in XP . For example , it ’s only possible to defrag one mass at a metre . The utility does not let in a programming affair , however , it is possible to use the Windows Scheduler utility to run Defrag from the command cable . This is a somewhat complicated outgrowth and it ’s really only appropriate for advanced users and IT professionals . Information is available onmicrosoft.com .

­InWindows Vista , case " defrag " into the start ­menu search loge and press­ Enter . Note that you must be sign in as an decision maker to lead the Defrag utility.­

The Vista Defrag usefulness is easier to utilise and offers some significant advantages over the XP rendering . When you launch the software using the above bidding , you ’ll be face with a screen that allows you to control many aspects of the defragmentation process . The most useful of these is the ability to schedule defragmentation to run at a time that is commodious for you .

Defrag for Other Operating Systems

As you might suspect , operating organization such as Mac OS andLinuxuse different file management systems and have different requirements in term of defragmentation .

Theoperating systemfor Apple ’s Macintosh computers does n’t include a built - in defragmentation app , although third - company utilities are available . According to Apple , Mac OS is designed to reduce fragmentation by writing raw data to larger open areas of the record . small-scale segments , such as those left over when a single file is deleted , are only used when necessary . Macintosh software developers are aim advantage of fasterhard drivesto get rid of fragmentation by always writing complete filing cabinet to the disk rather than adding data to existing files . Mac bone ( 10.3 Panther ) and later versions defragment file on an ongoing basis , making batch defragmentation unnecessary .

As for Linux , there are two major reason defragging is less of an issue . First , Linux does n’t stack away single file in order , so there ’s often room to append data to an subsist file in its current location . Linux also places the magnetic disc reading point at the marrow of the record . Unless a file is fragmented to diametrical slope of the disc , the head can reach multiple bunch chop-chop . Linux is n’t , however , immune to fragmentation , specially when a disc nears its maximal capacity . The defective news is , when the disk is nearly full ( more than 75 percent of space used ) , it becomes more difficult for a defrag utility to maneuver effectively . So , by the time a Linux magnetic disc becomes fragmented enough to slow thing down , it ’s unmanageable to work the job . For many users , this paradox provides a reason to defragment Linux hard drives on an ongoing basis .

Third - party defrag applications are useable for all operating system of rules . In addition to defragmentation , many of these utility provide additional capabilities , such as :

But what about non - mechanically skillful disk technologies such as solid state or thumb drive ? Some computer manufacturer are already putting them in laptops and other electronic devices . Do those need to be defragged , too ?

The cause defragmenting a surd drive can increase compute speed is because the drive uses moving parts ( the disc and drive head ) to access data . A solid state drive has no act role , so retrieving any specific flake of datum command the same access time no matter where the file clusters are store . In fact , some experts exact that defragmenting a solid state drive may actually be harmful . self-colored statememory can be write and overwrite many times , but there is a limit . Each time data are written to a mo ofmemory , its lifespan is decreased somewhat . Therefore , continuously defragmenting a pollex crusade could rush its dying with no veridical welfare .

Disk Defragmentation Tips

Given everything we ’ve learned , is it worthwhile to defragment your hard drive ? The answer is yes , but New cause technology is likely to reduce the speed gains . With that in mind , here are a few suggestion regarding defragmentation :

So , while new disk drive technology may cut the benefit of defragmentation , it still pays to get your ducks in a rowing from time to time . For more on hard cause and related topics , take a whirl over to the next Sir Frederick Handley Page .

Lots More Information

Sources