Yup ! You ’ve cause it . snub someone is natural . Next question .
OK , it may be a snatch more complicated than that . For instance , what if the someone you ’re ignoring is someone you ’ve told 10 time not to contact you ? In that case , it ’s not just free to ignore them ; it might be downright unwise to get back in contact with them at all . On the other hand , what if some auto sales representative istextingyou 14 times a week about that SUV you test drove , and you ’re just too lazy to tell apart him you ’re not interested in buying any longer ? Are you obligated , by etiquette , to give him a response , or can you just pretend he does n’t be until he function by ?
Digital etiquette is a new frontier — a new , boring frontier full of half - baked rule that nobody has agreed on . The Bro Council , which taps into that lucrative market of those who wish to cheerfully ego - identify as bros , claims you should always text someone back " if you require to detain friend with the individual " [ source : Abel ] . Woman ’s Day magazine — in my imagination , facing off in a United Nations - vogue world-wide assembly against Bro Council — seems to think ignoring school text is equality for the course and that the substantial key is for the texter to discontinue texting in the Bob Hope of a reply [ source : Cepeda ] . And to retrieve that gender harmoniousness and par seemed so dear .
So who to believe ? Some bad news : Etiquette may have some " experts , " but there ’s no actual authority . Of of course , etiquette is also based on cultural constructions , meaning that even if Miss Manners were to detail every single texting faux pas or imperative , any convention could easily change with societal shift key .
This leaves us in the unfortunate perspective of having to decide for ourselves , on a font - by - case foundation , whether ignoring a school text is bonnie or nasty . And so we kind of end up where we ’ve take off : Yup , brush aside texts is rude . But there are circumstances of reasons to do so that may leave one without mistake . So permit ’s coiffure some ground principle to make it easier in the hereafter . You should n’t disregard a text from a supporter or family unit member . model : " Hi love , it ’s your mummy . I enjoy you ! " Sure , it ’s not strictly necessary , but just say " hi " back . Maybe if the textual matter is begging for a response , we should in the main assume that a reply is involve . For example : " Are you coming over justly now with the shovel and rubber gloves or going to drop by later ? " Urgency might be another reason that silence might be primitive . For example , if someone texted to enquire if you could please come down to the cityjailand military post bond , you could presume that person would like to know ASAP if you ’re go to do it .
The machine salesperson ? No duty . Nobody wants to text with a unknown , after all .
