Even if you look to skill fiction , doctors have n’t been entirely replaced by computers . If you remember " Star Trek : Voyager " , a TV show set in the 24th century , holographical doctor are commonplace . But they ’re known as Emergency Medical Holograms because they ’re only intended to be used in the event of an emergency . As the series come on , however , the EMH on the show ( bonk only as The Doctor ) has to become the full - time principal medical officer aboard the ship out of necessity , and he have the job done just fine . He even becomes a full - mature character on the show .

In material life , we confabulate computers alternatively of doctors already , using the Internet to research symptoms and conditions before we even believe about making an appointment . That ’s still not the same as trusting an real person , though , and some mass fence that computers can never replace doctors for that reason . reckoner ca n’t have long conversation with patients to tease out bits of data that may be helpful in forming a diagnosis , nor can they show empathy to make that patient feel comfortable . No , we do n’t go to the doctor to make friends , but it ’s not nice to experience like a routine , either .

If you were to sum up the answer to this question in one word , it would be " depends . " Will medical specialty as a professing be wholly disused in the future ? Probably not . Will computers exchange Dr. for some thing ? believably so . The only matter that ’s sure is that medicine as we know it will change drastically in the future .

People who drop a line and account on the topic disaccord as to on the dot what ’s going to happen , though . How do expert count in on the part of robots and electronic computer infuture medicinal drug ? More on that next .

Man vs. Machine

There ’s no doubt thatcomputersare becoming more sophisticated , and plenty of people conceive that they ’ll replace doctor to at least some extent . Dr. Kent Bottles argue that " within five years , elementary care providers will be put back by sociable humanoid robots , avatars and computer curriculum " [ rootage : KevinMD ] . He believes there will still be doctors , but they ’ll all narrow as computers take over the basic purpose of a primary doctor . Manydiseases– what Dr. Bottles call " rule - free-base chronic diseases " because we can empathise them very well from a scientific standpoint – can be diagnosed and treat by a computing machine , including type II diabetes . This leaves Dr. free to diagnose and treat chronic disease that take more intuition and logical thinking , like schizophrenia .

Farhad Manjoo , a technological author whose married woman is a pathologist , fit in that computers will replace doctor , but it ’s not the primary - care providers who should be concerned . Doctors who are specialist – like his wife – are the ones whose job are in trouble . Manjoo reasons that " robots are great specialist . They surpass at doing one matter repeatedly , and when they focus , they can achieve near perfection " [ origin : Slate ] . Because chief doctors treat a wide variety of disease and condition , they ’re versatile enough to keep their job . They also have those all - important communicating science .

Or do they ? There ’s yet another persuasion out there . Ezra Klein points out that medico , while good at the science part of practise medicine , are n’t always ripe at the conversation part . Computers can divide " conversation , the human ingredient of the pattern , from the expert diagnosis " [ generator : Washington Post ] . Klein says that doctors ' bureau already have people majuscule at the former : nurses . So maybe some master - care physician will lose their jobs , but we ’ll still call for some form of human health care professional to talk to us and flow our information into a estimator . Other professions now flux calculator and human elements , like accountancy .

Computers are already doing a lot of piece of work in medicine . learn on to con about their roles today .

Surgical Robots

Since the firstrobot - assisted surgeryin 1985 , robotlike surgery has gotten a portion of attending . Today , the most common system is the da Vinci Surgical System . It has a 3D - television camera system that surgeons catch on a screen , as well as automatonlike arms that hold instrument inside the patient ’s body . The organisation translates a surgeon ’s hired hand movements , using automatonlike arms , into much diminished movements inside , allowing for tiny incisions in surgeries that would otherwise necessitate large one ( and much more discomfort and convalescence metre ) . This system of rules is used in more than 800 hospitals in the United States and Europe . But until 2010 , none of these automatic surgeries was exclusively performed by robot – it was always a robot mirror the move of a surgeon . Some robotic surgery in 2010 , however , were " full robotic " – a surgeon contract some buttons but did not manipulate the legal instrument in any way .

Robots are also used to help diagnose and treat disease . The Pap smear is a exam that most woman are intimate with – it help name cervical cancer , and women get one every year . The slides are often analyzed by an automate system , which place areas of concern for a person to review later on . This process has been test to aid get more instance of pre - cancerous lesion , take to more computing gadget - aided disease nosology .

Watson , the contrived intelligence IBM computer famous for work over " Jeopardy ! " objector in 2011 , is also being used to help diagnose atmospheric condition . The machine can apply its evidence - base erudition and raw words capabilities to invite a interrogation from a doctor and mine the in style medical datum to help make a diagnosing .

But the question remain : Would hoi polloi ever take just speaking to a computing machine instead of a doctor ? Dr. Bottles thinks so . He cites a medical kiosk incarnation featured at a instrument panel call " Man - Made Minds : Living With Thinking Machines " at the World Science Festival in 2011 . The kiosk was used by a young female parent who was interested about her nestling ’s diarrhoea . The panel moderator state that " the avatar was much more compassionate in relating to the child and his mother than human triage lactate she has encounter as a mother taking her shaver to New York City Hospital emergency suite " [ source : Kevin MD ] .

As long as we can feel cared about and we ’re getting exact diagnosis and discussion , maybe it does n’t matter whether the somebody giving it is a human or a robot .

I suspect that many people are like me – they ’ve dealt with health care professional person all over the spectrum . I ’ve had some amazingly empathetic single . I ’ve had ones who just said two words to me and never made eye contact . I ’ve had ones who seemed more interested in state me about their day than finding out why I was there in the first place . And I ’ve also had ones that made mistakes . mayhap some citizenry would initially feel uncomfortable getting a diagnosis and intervention from a computer , but there ’s always a scholarship curve . Those people who joked about never being able to get their VCR to do anything but nictitate " 12:00 " are using cell phones now . I remember that it ’ll terminate up being a mix of the two – even if they can seem compassionate , it will be tough for some people to say their stories ( and that ’s what aesculapian histories can be ) to a data processor . Even if it ’s a " sociable human golem . "

Sources